I cannot express how irate and disappointed I am with this country. Our country has been hit with one of the largest natural disasters in my lifetime and this has shown, to the American people and to the world in general how poorly we handle it. I mean, there are people still being rescued, aid still being sent and a city being drained in order to be rebuilt and all I see on the news is bunch of armchair emergency workers criticizing each and every play that is being made by the people actually out there trying to aid the victims of the disaster and recover the Gulf Coast.
I will not state that the emergency plans were the most efficient, the most alacritous or the best laid of plans - but criticizing them now, pointing fingers at our favorite targets, does little in the recovery effort. An investigation will be held and people will be blamed. Money will be allocated away from other vital causes to help prevent a repeat of this episode. (Until such time as the lack of funding in that department bites us in the ass and the chits will be reorganized again.) But why now? What does this serve to complain at this moment in history.
My point of view is this. If I need surgery and I'm under the knife, now is not the time to take the Doc aside to complain about his precision or acuity, or worse, send in some other guy who barely knows what the procedure is to finish the job. Just finish the job as best you can. Similarly, the middle of a military engagement is not the time to pull the commander off the field for a hearing and a courts martial. We are still in an emergency situation and lets let the people in place see this through. Then we can send in the investigatory committees, have the hearing and the sessions of Congress, point the fingers, spin the rhetoric and find the scapegoats (or maybe even the guilty parties) for any failings in this response.
And to argue those people who might say, "What's the harm in pointing out failings of this process right now." The harm is significant. The people coordinating the relief and rescue efforts are human beings. They just have the job of supporting the business of saving people. (Whether they are Emergency Rescue Workers, FEMA administrators, Administrative Assistants or what have you.) And they are doing that job right now. However, these people are either voted in, or they report to someone voted in. And as much as they want to help people (assuming most people like the work they do), they want to keep their jobs. They have families and expenses and, well like all human beings, they'll drop looking out for others if they have to start worrying about themselves. This is likely why so many of the local law enforcement and emergency workers quit in the wake of the hurricane. Well, the more folks like Michael Moore pass around sarcastic critiques of the Bush Administration's response, the more the people who are working to fix this problem will stop taking care of the situation and start trying to cover their own asses to protect their livelihood. I don't see how that helps anyone except those people who are using Katrina to push their agendas of deposing Bush.
Now, I'm not here to be an apoligist for ole' W. I've never voted for him, I don't even like him. But right now I sorta pity him. For 6 years this country has become strongly polarized against him, perhaps more so than ever before save for the Jefferson-Adams conflict. I can't think of a single other president who has so much partisan vitriol directed at him for such a long time. And, especially in this political clime, it seems when blame is looked for, this country tends to aim for the head. I can see the possibility of Bush taking the fall for this one, and I'm not convinced he's guilty. He may have made mistakes, mistakes that seem clear with the benefit of hindsight. But we, the people, voted for senators that supported the President's ambitions in Iraq, that supported the moving of numbers of our gaurdsmen into Iraq, and that supported budgetary changes that focused on anti-terrorism. That extra money had to come from somewhere. It's not like Bush could have forseen that mild mannered Katrina who barely hobbled to Cat 1 passing over Florida would be the explosive cyclone it turned out to be. It's not like Bush personally hired the horrific police officers mentioned in the story being passed around by
So, yeah, I'm apalled by the Politicians and the Pundits and the Hollywood Socialites crying outrage at the people working to fix things when the corpse of the coast is not even yet cold in, what seems to me, a blatant attempt to politically rebel against the long despised King George. And they are playing on the people's concern and sympathy and good will to sway us to their goals. And so, I simply ask - please wait. An investigation will surely be had and the evidence will be shown. Only after that time can we find the causes and seek to correct them so we are better prepared for the next disaster.
September 10 2005, 09:03:22 UTC 6 years ago
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with this. I don't think that the right people will in fact be blamed.
I don't think that Bush will be held accountable for cutting FEMA funding by 50% to Louisiana, and for making a man who was fired from his last job for incompetence the head of FEMA. I think that it has been handled worth a damn from that quarter, at all, and incompetence trickled on down.
His administration is notorious for its trickle-down paradigm: no one beneath him moves until he does, and they don't let the people move, either.
New Orleans had been declared an emergency situation before Katrina ever made landfall, and it took far, far too long to get any kind of authority handed down from on high to those on the scene who could use it.
I know I am perhaps irrationally emotional in this regard, because of the love I have for New Orleans. You mentioned a good reason why we shouldn't be casting blame - because of the people who are on hand, who don't need the added worry of being concerned for being held accountable.
That is because, in Bush's administration, they are the ones who get fired when he and his cronies fuck up. It happens all the bloody time. The people who are on hand have nothing but my firmest support and deepest gratitude for doing what I cannot. I listened to the Mayor of NOLA's desperate interview - he and the people there were begging for the authority from on high to do something, while Bush was still on vacation, and Condaleeza Rice was shopping for fucking shoes.
And as for waiting? That is the point where Bush's administration is at its best. When all the hard work is already done, and the end is in sight. When the spin machine goes into overdrive, and they swoop in there, shifting the blame to be had to those beneath them, while gobbling up the credit like vultures on a corpse that has finally expired.
I'm sick of it.
I fear this is likely to be an area where and I are going to have to just disagree. He needs to be held accountable. He does. I'm not stupid enough to somehow blame him for the hurricane. What I will blame him for is cutting the funding to FEMA, hiring incompetents to run FEMA, having the very men and women who signed aboard to help their state over in Iraq instead, and not handing down authority and stepping up to the plate when it was time to do so.
But I have absolutely no faith that that will happen, either.
Joe
September 10 2005, 15:13:19 UTC 6 years ago
And I tried to be careful in my post to not suppose who was to blame. And that is a really hard thing to do right now. The stories trickling from New Orleans are generally horrific and invariably imply one party or another being to blame. My own opinion is to jomp from blaiming Bush, to the state governments, to FEMA, to the individual people, and back again. And this sets off warning flares to me that I clearly don't know the whole story. It's why I'm trying to wait before I judge.
But I'll argue that a few of your points could be equally applied to any other administration. Every administration goes through some period of restructuring, every administration has programs which are underfunded in order to fund programs which are considered more important. Case in point, I work directly beneath the President. I'm part of his administration as much as any FEMA worker. The General Manager of Bettis Labs works directly for Admiral Donald who reports jointly to the Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman and the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Bettis has done essentially what its done for the last fifty years, irrespective of change in administration. Bettis keeps moving whether Bush is there at the helm or not. If changes need to be made, we'll enact those changes - but that is no different under Bush as it was under Ike. My point being in this example is that I disagree with your view of Bush's "trickle-down" administration. Though the president serves as the figurative head of our organization, the administration is not done by him, nor by his cabinet, but by the NR staff that work under the admiral and by the general management of Bettis. I see little reason to believe there to be so stark a difference with FEMA. And the way we work is relatively independent of administration.
But I feel like I'm digressing. I not here to convince you that Bush is blameless, exspecially because I'm not convinced of that myself. My point is simply to say that this is a topic for January, as Will puts it below. And we might have to disagree at this point, but I believe that the dialogue will be had. And Bush will be held up to explain his administration's actions and inactions. I say this because the machinery is already moving in that regard. You are one of millions of people across this country already angry and looking for answers and taking aim at the head. The people in the Anti-Bush campaign have seized this perfect opportunity to mobilize their weapons of war against King George. To have that amount to nothing... to have it just be glossed over in the wake of Katrina... to so blatantly ignore the will of the people is to say that we aren't the represented democracy that I believe this country to be. Since I'm unwilling to admit that the government will so ignore popular outcry, a popular outcry that is gaining momentum as we speak, I can't help but believe that the focus of the inquiry will be on Bush and his decisions over the past years.
I just hope they find the true causes underlying this. Causes that we can use to make lasting and effective changes in the organization of emergency management. But I fear that in all our hurry to punish someone for the suffering in New Orleans we might just miss the real problem.
September 10 2005, 20:06:11 UTC 6 years ago
A friend of mine made a post that nicely sums up my opinions on the topic:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/magent
Joe
September 10 2005, 12:42:05 UTC 6 years ago
September 10 2005, 12:53:55 UTC 6 years ago
I think Bush deserves some blame; he may have made sensible and reasonable decisions, but tough. If I'm in a job where I make reasonable and sensible decisions that go pear-shaped, I'm going to expect some share of the blame.
However, I think there's plenty of blame for the governor, the mayor, FEMA, FEMA management, and a host of other people.
I just think it's the sort of thing better sorted out in January.
September 10 2005, 15:16:27 UTC 6 years ago
In fact, thinking about it, a December or January investigation and hearing would probably enable us to see constructive changes before next years Hurricane Season.
October 21 2005, 13:24:19 UTC 6 years ago
best,
Joel